![]() ![]() #Ripit flavors windowsThe base would require almost everything that is in the Home edition ( though MS could always strip out IE and Media Player, and all that crap, or they could make it easier on themselves and go back to the Windows 9x installer style, giving us the option to customize what gets installed ( and including ALL non-essential components, or permitting usurping said basic requirements ( which would require releasing a lot of internal APIs and permitting access to them by 3rd-parties. It is not to say that it is not technically possible to create a base OS with compatibility from Windows 1.x to current iterations, it would just be more difficult to build this proper slim base as a releasable product. This will always occur on the bleeding edge, and Microsoft will always have to remove old baggage when the agreements with the aforementioned hardware suppliers ( and other companies, too ) finally permit it ( if MS has been smart, they have restricted duration to one single iteration of the OS, while also considering service packs as iterations ). ![]() #Ripit flavors fullHardware suppliers are obviously pushing Microsoft ( and likely with briefcases full of cash and other incentives ) to optimize the OS for specific patented paradigms implemented in hardware to push hardware sales. The only problem with that is with Microsoft’s bottom line. Now that’s NEWS to me! Thanks for informing. (or in inverse, make sure the card that’s going to be bought is supported by every OS including vista 64…) – or just use 32 to be on the safe side (not really safe either though) Well yeah, 64-bit Vista is a headache if there is at least ONE component that’s not supported – so make sure every single components are supported in vista 64 before choosing it. It’s trivial for me! (read: campus agreement here only provides one edition: Vista Business 32-bit. So I think it’s much simpler than choosing directly from all 31 editions at once It’s more like filtering choices between edition targets (home basic, home premium, business, enterprise, or ultimate), between 32- or 64-bit, and between N or normal. I mean, it’s not like we’re choosing all 31 editions directly. I thought buying ultimate get both editions? (not so sure) It’s severely crippled that no one should use it? Google for it and in no time you’ll find message board posts of people asking where to buy those versions. Might strike you as odd, but there are people actively trying to buy them. #Ripit flavors mac os xI know stories of IT crews standardising on those cards because they were so sure every OS under the sun would support it - even Mac OS X does, courtesy of Darwin… Then comes Vista 64. #Ripit flavors driversAs far as application compatibility goes, WoW64 makes it quite compelling to just grab the 64-bit version, but the chance of missing some drivers is very real (for example, Vista 32 bundles drivers for 3Com 3C905 cards, but Vista 64 doesn’t! (which kind of makes Vista 64 the single PC OS that is used by more than, say, 500 people around the world, and isn’t compatible with this card)). I can’t really agree with this simplification you’re making: remember that people (and businesses) buy systems with Vista pre-installed, so there are actual, real people facing the choice of several versions, including those you’re trying to disregard.Īnd, very unfortunately, deciding between 32- or 64-bit is anything but trivial. So if you want to choose, there are only 4 edition to choose first, and then decide if you need 32- or 64-bit. I was being courteous by counting just 9 versions to choose from Which doesn’t make it any less of a legitimate SKU.Įach version has 32- and 64-bit, and N and normal edition as well.Ĭorrect, but only Ultimate splits the two in separate disks. Let’s throw Starter Edition to trash first.Īnd AFAIK, we can only get Enterprise Edition as a company. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |